중간위험도 전립선암 환자의 치료 편집하기 (부분)

== 참고문헌 ==
1. Abel EJ, Masterson TA, Dechet C, et al. Nerve-sparing prostatectomy and urinary function: a prospective analysis using validated quality-of-life measures. Urology 2009;76:1336-40.

2. R Deborah, M Eric, P Pavlovich, et al. Urinary outcomes are significantly affected by nerve sparing quality during radical prostatectomy. Urol 2013;82:1348-54.

3. David B.S., M. Francesca Monn, Liang Cheng, et al. Oncologic and quality-of-life outcomes with wide resection in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2015;33:9-14.

4. Suardi N, Moschini M, Briganti A, et al. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery. BJU Int 2013;111(5):717-22.

5. Ficarra V, Novara G, Montorsi F, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:418-30.

6. Y Vette, Dubbelman, R Gert, et al. Sexual Function Before and After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Indicators for a Successful Outcome. Eur Urol 2006;50:711-20.

7. Walsh PC. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1988;159:308.

8. Montorsi F, Padma-Nathan H, McCullough A, Brock GB, Broderick G, Ahuja S, Whitaker S, Hoover A, Novack D, Murphy A, Varanese L. Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following bilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol 2004;172:1036-41.

9. Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schröder FH. Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy:A systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol 2006;50(4):711-8.

10. Avulova S, Zhao Z, Lee D, et al. The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study. J Urol 2017 16. pii: S0022-5347(17)78114-1.

11. Tsikis ST, Nottingham CU, Faris SF, et al. The Relationship Between Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Prostatectomy: Are They Mutually Exclusive? J Sex Med 2017;14(10):1241-7.

12. Gilbert SM, Dunn RL, Miller DC, et al. Functional Outcomes Following Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy Augmented with Seminal Vesicle Sparing Compared to Standard Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol 2017;198(3):600-7.

13. Uwe Michl, Pierre Tennstedt, Lena Feldmeier, et al. Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy European Urology 2016;69(4):590-1.

14. Fairleigh Reeves, Patrick Preece, Jada Kapoor, et al. Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles Is Associated with Improved Time to Continence After Radical Prostatectomy But Not Long-term Continence Rates:Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology 2015;68(4):692-704.

15. Nguyen LN, Head L, Witiuk, et al. The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol 2017;198(4):760-9.